Termout.org logo/LING


Update: February 24, 2023 The new version of Termout.org is now online, so this web site is now obsolete and will soon be dismantled.

Lista de candidatos sometidos a examen:
1) language processing (*)
(*) Términos presentes en el nuestro glosario de lingüística

1) Candidate: language processing


Is in goldstandard

1
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines336 - : What evidence have we obtained concerning lexical functions? We presented a sufficient number of collocations annotated with lexical functions to the computer that learned characteristic features of each function. It was demonstrated that the computer was able to assign lexical functions to unseen collocations with a significant average accuracy of 0.759. Is it satisfactory? We can compare our result with computer performance on another task of natural language processing: word sense disambiguation, i .e., identifying the intended meanings of words in context. Today, automated disambiguating systems reach the accuracy of about 0.700 and this is considered a substantial achievement. As an example of such works see (Zhong & Tou Ng, 2010). Therefore, our result is weighty enough to be a trustworthy evidence for the linguistic statement under discussion.

2
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines453 - : Luzondo, A. & Jiménez, R. (2014). FrameNet and FunGramKB: A comparison of two computational resources for semantic knowledge representation. In B. Nolan & C. Periñán (Eds.), Language processing and grammars: The role of functionally oriented computational models (pp . 197-232). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. [ [136]Links ]

3
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines510 - : “Relational nouns can be connected to their arguments/values by a variety of verbs and prepositions, which constitute a semantic complex that is also used, with exactly the same structure but with a different meaning, to operate on non-relational nouns […]. These terms (like “of”, “have” and “with”) are highly polysemous, and any language processing system must encompass mechanisms for disambiguating their intended meaning in any particular utterance” (^[155]De Bruin & Scha, 1988: 26-27 ).

Evaluando al candidato language processing:


3) lexical: 3 (*)

language processing
Lengua: eng
Frec: 119
Docs: 57
Nombre propio: 1 / 119 = 0%
Coocurrencias con glosario: 1
Puntaje: 1.379 = (1 + (1+2) / (1+6.90689059560852)));
Candidato aceptado

Referencias bibliográficas encontradas sobre cada término

(Que existan referencias dedicadas a un término es también indicio de terminologicidad.)
language processing
: Baker, C. (2014). FrameNet: A knowledge base for natural language processing. In Proceedings of Frame Semantics in NLP: A workshop in honor of Chuck Fillmore (1929-2014) (pp. 1-5). Baltimore, Maryland.
: Berger, A., Della Pietra S. & Della Pietra, S. (1996). A maximum entropy approach to natural language processing, Computational Linguistics, 22(1), 39-71.
: Brill, E. (1995). Transformation-based error-driven learning and natural language processing: A case study in part-of-speech tagging. Computational Linguistics, 21, 543-566.
: Carlisle, J. (1995). Morphological awareness and early reading achievement. En L. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 189-209). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
: Carpuat, M. & Wu, D. (2007). Improving statistical machine translation using word sense disambiguation. Proceedings of the 2007 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learnin (pp. 61-72).
: Chen, H.-J. (2009). Evaluating two web-based grammar checkers - Microsoft ESL Assistant and NTNU Statistical Grammar Checker. Computational Linguistics and Chinese Language Processing,
: Ciaramita, M. & Altun, Y. (2006). Broad-coverage sense disambiguation and information extraction with a supersense sequence tagger. Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (pp. 594-602). Association for Computational Linguistics.
: Cuetos, F., Mitchell, D. & Corley, M. (1996). Parsing in different languages. En M. Carreiras, J. García- Albea & N. Sebastián (Eds.), Language processing in Spanish (pp. 145-187). Hillsdale, NJ: Earlbaum.
: Cummins, J. (1991). Interdependence of first-second-language proficiency in bilingual children. En E. Bialystok (Ed.), Language processing in bilingual children (pp. 70-89). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
: Gaidhane, M. S. C., Gondhale, M. D. P. & Talole, M. P. (2015). A comparative study of stemming algorithms for natural language processing. International Journal of Engineering, Education and Technology (ARDIJEET), 3(2), 1-6.
: Gargham, A. (1999) Reference and anaphora. En S. Garrod y M. Pickering (Eds.) Language Processing. Hove, Psychology Press. 335-362.
: Garrod, S. & Sanford, A. J. (1983). Topic dependent effects in language processing. En G. Flores D’Arcais & R. Jarvella (Eds.), The process of language understanding (pp. 271-296). Chichester: Wiley & Sons.
: Gliozzo, A., Magnini, B. & Strapparava, C. (2004). Unsupervised domain relevance estimation for word sense disambiguation. Proceedings of the Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing Conference, Barcelona, Spain.
: Hanks, P. & Pustejovsky, J. (2005). A pattern Dictionary for Natural Language Processing. Revue Française de linguistique appliquée, 10(2), 63-82.
: Hanks, P. (2009). The linguistic double helix: norms and exploitations. En D. Hlavácková, A. Horák , K. Osolsobě & P. Rychlý (Eds.), After half a century of Slavonic natural language processing (Festschrift for Karel Pala) (pp. 63-80). Brno: Masaryk University .
: Huettig, F., Rommers, J. & Meyer, A. S. (2011). Using the visual world paradigm to study language processing: A review and critical evaluation. Acta psychologica, 137(2), 151-171.
: Ide, N., Erjavec, T. & Tufis, D. (2001). Automatic sense tagging using parallel corpora. In Proceedings of the Sixth Natural Language Processing Pacific Rim Symposium -NLPRS (pp. 83-90).
: Jackson, P. & Moulinier, I. (2003). Natural language processing for online applications. Text retrieval, extraction and categorization. Philadelphia: Benjamins.
: Jurafsky, D. & Martin, J. (2000). An introduction to natural language processing, computational linguistics and speech processing, Prentice Hall.
: Jurafsky, D. & Martin, J. (en preparación). Dependency parsing. Speech and Language Processing (3a ed.) [en línea]. Disponible en: [140]https://web.stanford.edu/~jurafsky/slp3/14.pdf
: Jurafsky, D. & Martin, J.H. (2000). Speech and language processing: An introduction to natural language processing, computational linguistics, and speech recognition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
: Luzondo, A. & Ruiz de Mendoza, F. (2015). Argument structure constructions in a Natural Language Processing environment. Language Sciences, 48(2015), 70-89.
: Manning, C. & Schütze, H. (1999). Foundations of statistical natural language Processing. Boston: The MIT Press.
: Mausam, Schmitz, M., Bart, R., Soderland, S. & Etzioni, O. (2012). Open language learning for Information Extraction. Proceedings of the 2012 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning (EMNLP-CoNLL ‘12), 523-534.
: Maynard, D. & Ananiadou, S. (2000). TRUCKS: A model for automatic multi-word term recognition. Journal of Natural Language Processing, 8(1), 101-125.
: McKoon, G. & Ratcliff, R. (1998). Memory based language processing: Psycholinguistic research in the 1990’s. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 25-42.
: Meilán, J. J., Martínez-Sánchez, F., Carro, J., Sánchez, J. A. & Pérez, E. (2012). Acoustic markers associated with impairment in language processing in Alzheimer’s disease. The Spanish journal of psychology, 15(2), 487-494.
: Mel’čuk, I. (1996). Lexical functions: A tool for the description of lexical relations in a lexicon. In L. Wanner (Ed.), Lexical functions in lexicography and natural language processing (pp. 37–102). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: Johm Benjamins.
: Mihalcea, R. & Tarau, P. (2004). TextRank: Bringing order into texts. Ponencia presentada en Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing,Barcelona, España.
: Miikkulainen, M., & Dyer, M. (1991). Natural language processing with modular PDP networks and distributed lexicon. Cognitive Science, 15, 345-399.
: Mitchell, D. C. (2004). On-line methods in language processing: Introduction and historical review. En M. Carreiras & C. Clifton (Eds.), The on-line study of sentence comprehension: Eyetracking, ERPs and beyond (pp. 15-32). Nueva York: Psychology Press.
: Murawaki, Y. (2013). Global model for hierarchical multi-label text classification. International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, 46-54.
: Padró, L., Collado, M., Reese, S., Lloberes, M. & Castellón, I. (2010). FreeLing 2.1: Five years of open-source language processing tools. Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’10), 931-936.
: Pennacchiotti, M. & Pantel, P. (2009). Entity extraction via ensemble semantics. En Proceedings of Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Singapore: ACL.
: Periñán, C. & Arcas, F. (2014). The implementation of the CLS constructor in ARTEMIS. In B. Nolan & C. Periñán (Eds.), Language processing and grammars. The role of functionally oriented computational models (pp. 165-196). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
: Pexman, P. M., Siakaluk, P. D. & Yap, M. J. (2013). Introduction to the research topic meaning in mind: Semantic richness effects in language processing. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 723.
: Pienemann, M. (1998). Language processing and second language development: Processability theory. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
: Pérez, D., Alfonseca, E., Rodriguez, P., Gliozzo, A., Strapparava, C, &Magnini, B. (2005). About the effects of combining Latent Semantic Analysis with natural language processing techniques for free-text assessment. Revista Signos, 38(59), 325-343.
: Raskin, V. (1987). Linguistics and natural language processing. In S. Nirenburg (Ed.), Machine translation: Theoretical and methodological issues (pp. 42-58). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
: Rosé, C., Roque, A., Bhembe, D. & VanLehn, K. (2003). A hybrid text classification approach for analysis of student essays. Proceedings of the HLT-NAACL workshop Building Educational Applications Using Natural Language Processing, Edmonton, Canada.
: Schank, R. (1975). The role of memory in language processing. En C. Cofer & R. Atkinson (Eds.), The nature of human memory. San Francisco: Freedman.
: Schmid, H. (1994). Probabilistic part-of-speech tagging using decision trees. Ponencia presentada en el International Conference on New Methods in Language Processing, Manchester, United Kingdom.
: Siddiqui, T. & Tiwary, U. S. (2008). Natural language processing and information retrieval. Nueva Dehli: Oxford University Press.
: Spivey-Knowlton, M., Trueswell, J. & Tanenhaus, M. (1993). Context effects in syntactic ambiguity resolution: Parsing reduced relative clauses. Canadian Journal of Psychology: Special Issue: Reading and Language Processing, 47(2), 276-309.
: Teufel, S., Siddharthan, A. & Tidhar, D. (2006). Automatic classification of citation function. Ponencia presentada en the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Sydney, Australia.
: The internal architecture of Atenea is composed of a statistical module, called ERB, and several Natural Language Processing (NLP) modules based on the wraetlic tools (Alfonseca, 2003).
: Tolone, E. (2012). Conversión de las tablas del Léxico-Gramática del francés en el léxico LGLex. Ponencia presentada en el 2nd Argentinian Workshop on Natural Language Processing (WNLP’11), Córdoba, Argentina.
: Vickrey, D., Biewald, L., Teyssier, M. & Koller, D. (2005). Word-sense disambiguation for machine translation. Proceedings of the conference on Human Language Technology and Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (pp. 771-778). Association for Computational Linguistics.
: Zhou F., Zhang, F. & Yang, B. (2010). Graph-based text representation model and its realization. Ponencia presentada en el International Conference on Natural Language Processing and Knowledge Engineering, Beijing, China.